The professional identity of STEM faculty as instructors of course-based research experiences
2024publishedFrontiers in Educationvolume 910.3389/feduc.2024.1442306doiopen accesslicense
PDFPMCBibTeXRISAsk about this paper
Cited by 11 OpenAlex, read 2026-10-01
What 97 instructors of research courses say about being a scientist and a teacher at the same time.
Abstract
The professional identity of scientists has historically been cultivated to value research over teaching, which can undermine initiatives that aim to reform science education. Course-Based Research Experiences (CRE) and the inclusive Research and Education Communities (iREC) are two successful and impactful reform efforts that integrate research and teaching. The aim of this study is to explicate the professional identity of instructors who implement a CRE within an established iREC and to explore how this identity contributes to the success of these programs. 97 CRE instructors from the Science Education Alliance (SEA) iREC participated in a 2-year, multi-stage, qualitative research project that involved weekly reflective journaling, autoethnographic description, small group evaluation and writing, and large-scale community checking. The resulting description of professional identity consisted of shared values (inclusivity, student success, community membership, ownership/agency, science, overcoming failure, and persistence), specified roles (mentor, advocate, scientist, educator, motivator, collaborator, community builder, learner, evaluator and project manager) and a stated sense of self (dedicated, resilient, pride in students, multiskilled, valued, community member, responsible and overworked). Analysis of individual reflective diary entries revealed how a professional identity underpinned and facilitated the ways in which faculty addressed challenges that arose and worked toward the success of every student. It is the self-concept of the professional identity of the instructor in the context of the CRE classroom that directed the extended commitment and effort that these instructors evidently put into their work with students, which facilitated student engagement, student persistence, and their collective scientific output. The study concludes that a professional identity of STEM faculty in the context of a CRE and iREC combines being a researcher and educator, and that this integrated identity is central for current initiatives aimed at transforming undergraduate STEM education.
Cited by 11
OpenAlex, read 2026-09-12. Newest first.
- Science Teachers' Perceptions on Integrating Sustainability Education into STEM-Based Deep Learning, AMPLITUDO Journal of Science & Technology Innovation, 2026
- Community Inter-Autoethnography: A Methodology for Community-Level Understanding, Written Communication, 2026
- From workshop to classroom: implementation of new assessment practices by chemistry faculty members at two-year institutions, Frontiers in Education, 2026
- Harnessing the power of community to navigate biology education careers, Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 2026
- On being and becoming a chemistry teacher: negotiating identity, intersectionality, and pedagogical reforms, International Journal of Science Education, 2026
- Professional vision enhancement through visualization-supported teacher training: who benefits?, Interactive Learning Environments, 2025
- Лідерська компетентність у професійній підготовці викладачів природничих дисциплін: орієнтири та міжнародні практики, Педагогічний дискурс, 2025
- The illusion of inclusion: structural and methodological gaps in biology education research, Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 2025
- Advancing Integrative Pollinator Biology Education With Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences, Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2025
- The Future of Virology Education, Annual Review of Virology, 2025
- An inclusive Research and Education Community (iREC) model to facilitate undergraduate science education reform, Frontiers in Education, 2024